Dissent agenda item in Associations Now

January 9th, 2008

Many thanks to blogger buddy Lisa Junker from Associations Now and Acronym for allowing me to republish her piece on the dissent agenda that appears in the 2008 Volunteer Leadership Issue of the magazine. This issue is available for quantity purchases, and I recommend that you pick up some extra copies for your board and other association leaders.

Lisa and I did a telephone interview about the dissent agenda a few months ago, and she did a great job conveying the idea. Fundamentally, using a dissent agenda is a tool for building a sustainable capacity for effective strategic discourse and decision-making within our organizations, and especially our boards. Without this capacity, our strategic conversations may tend to exclude controversial or unpopular “edge” perspectives surrounding the critical issues we face, thereby depriving our leaders of invaluable information and insight.

Enjoy the article and let me know what you think. Would your association implement a dissent agenda? Post your comments below. And thanks again Lisa!

Ms. Chairman, I dissent!

The idea of a consent agenda has gained traction among association boards and gov­ernance experts in recent years. But have you ever considered adding a dissent agenda to your board meetings? According to Jeff De Cagna, founder and chief strategist of Principled Innovation LLC, you should.

A “dissent agenda” is a mechanism De Cagna suggests for boards to openly monitor and measure dissent. “It comes back to a desire to see more innovation happen in our organizations,” he says. “We’re going to get innovation by encouraging a diversity of perspectives … creating a safe space in our organizations for diverse views.” But in many associations, collegiality is so highly valued that open argument is uncomfortable or subtly discouraged. De Cagna sees the dissent agenda as a way to recognize and create acceptance of the fact that, in the real world, not everyone is going to agree on every decision that comes before a board.

If dissent is stifled, says De Cagna, “that does not send the right message to the mem­bership. It doesn’t send the right message particularly to younger members—they want to see transparency” and often are very attuned to the importance of diversity, includ­ing diversity of thought. It also has practical consequences: Without dissent, “we’re not going to get the best ideas. We’re not going to get the best work out of each other. We’ll miss the opportunity to create value for our members and our customers.”

De Cagna envisions a substantive document that tracks each issue where dissent appears. It would show the various views represented and their differences of opinion, as well as the resolution reached or actions taken in each case. The document could also help board members, both individually and as a group, define their stance on an issue more concretely so that distinct points of agreement and compromise can be found—as well as helping the board to discover points of misperception or miscommunication. The document would be prepared after each meeting and sent out with the meeting minutes, as well as with the agenda for the next board meeting.

“It would be an extraordinary record of where the organization has been in the view of its board members and how it has hopefully progressed over time,” says De Cagna. He adds, “I would reiterate that organizations shouldn’t consider this to be just a neat, gim­micky companion to their consent agenda. If they want to be serious about going down this road, this is a tool of trust, transparency, and embracing diverse perspectives.”

If you're new here, I hope you will consider subscribing to the P.I. Blog. Just click on this link to add it to your RSS reader. You can also receive e-mail updates by subscribing via the box located on the blog itself. Thanks for visiting!


Entry Filed under: Principled Innovation Blog, Announcements, What's New?, Innovation, Associations, Extreme Makeover, The Association Innovator, Simplicity, We Have Always Done It That Way, PI Services, Garage Memes, Governing for Innovation


1 Comment Add your own

  • 1. Lisa Junker  |  January 10th, 2008 at 7:56 am

    Thanks for posting this, Jeff! I’m glad to have had the chance to share your dissent agenda concept with the readers of the Leadership Issue. If you hear of any associations that start using one, I’d love to hear about their experiences with it …

Leave a Comment

Required

Required, hidden

*
To prove that you're not a bot, enter this code
Anti-Spam Image

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed

  • Ben Martin and P.I.

    Association exec Ben Martin, CAE is P.I.’s Architect of Participation. Jeff and Ben help clients harness the power of the Web through the strategic application of social tools.

  • Buy the AST Report!

    The Association Social Technologies Report is available for just $149, an excellent value for any association thinking about using social tools.  Buy it today!


P.I. Blog written by

Jeff De Cagna

Get the P.I. Blog!

Most Recent Posts

Categories

Blogroll

Posts by Month