Relevance is a losing argument

January 5th, 2008

We have constructed a reality for ourselves that makes relevance the strategic endgame for our associations. The problem is that we live in a time of disruption induced by unabated paradigm shift. In today’s world, relevance isn’t the endgame, it’s the price of admission. Let me put it another way.

If we’re not already relevant, we’re toast.

Consider this quote from blogger Umair Haque:

In a discontinuous world, incrementalism is deeply toxic. It plunges us more and more deeply into competence traps, and leaves us more and more vulnerable to competitors who are busy revolutionizing industries, markets, products, services.

Relevance isn’t an argument for “revolutionizing” our organizations, or for the pursuit of the radical, disruptive innovation we so desperately need. Relevance isn’t the business case for realizing our full potential. Relevance is the narrative of incrementalism, a lame excuse for embracing the lowest common denominator, and a bankrupt rationalization for maintaining the status quo. It is also a sure recipe for inexorable decline.

Stop trying to establish your association’s relevance. It’s a losing argument, and thus a waste of everyone’s time and attention, especially yours. Instead, leave your members and customers with no alternative but to notice what you’re doing because you’ve created the kinds of radical new value that will knock them on their you-know-whats. Once you’ve got their attention, get them directly involved in helping you keep it.

Remember, limitations suck, so stop thinking and playing small. Break out and think big. Dare to be amazing.

Entry Filed under: Principled Innovation Blog, What's New?, Social Media, Innovation, Associations, Extreme Makeover, The Association Innovator, Simplicity, We Have Always Done It That Way, Garage Memes, Governing for Innovation, Socially Responsible Innovation


1 Comment Add your own

  • 1. Scott Steen  |  January 8th, 2008 at 8:30 pm

    I couldn’t agree more. I always thought relevance was a strange aspiration — “Gee, we are irrelevant now, but we hope to some day be relevant.” Anyone shooting for relevance as a goal for their organization is aiming too low.

Leave a Comment

Required

Required, hidden

*
To prove that you're not a bot, enter this code
Anti-Spam Image

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed

  • Ben Martin and P.I.

    Association exec Ben Martin, CAE is P.I.’s Architect of Participation. Jeff and Ben help clients harness the power of the Web through the strategic application of social tools.

  • New P.I. workshop

    You may now register for The P.I. Business Model Innovation Workshop, which will take place on September 28-29, 2010, in Arlington, Virginia.


P.I. Blog written by

Jeff De Cagna

Get the P.I. Blog!

Most Recent Posts

Categories

Blogroll

Posts by Month