Association 5.0

November 5th, 2007

Blogger bud Maddie Grant has a couple of recent posts on the notion of Association 2.0 that I found quite interesting. Of course, Maddie is not the first association blogger to write on this topic. My WHADITW co-author David Gammel wrote an article on Association 2.0 that appeared in Associations Now magazine in January 2006. With all of the blogospheric hype around Web 2.0 and Enterprise 2.0, it makes intuitive sense that we should be talking about Association 2.0 and, frankly, I’m a little surprised there hasn’t been more conversation about the idea in the two years since David’s article was published.

The fundamental concern I have always had with the concept of Association 2.0, however, is that we’re already way beyond version 2.0. In fact, I would argue that we are now on Association 5.0, just based on the following simplified timeline of how associations have emerged in America over the last 250+ years:

Association 1.0–The original formation of many national associations begins in the late 18th century through the late 19th century.

Association 2.0–Local associations and chapters begin to emerge in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.

Association 3.0–ASAE was founded in 1920, the first membership organization for association managers.

Association 4.0–ASAE first offers the Certified Association Executive designation in 1960, making the professionalization of association management a top priority.

Association 5.0–ASAE & The Center for Association Leadership merge in 2004.

Now, we could quibble about the specifics of this timeline, but it doesn’t change the larger point: our community is further along in its historic evolution than the second generation. The problem we must confront, then, is that the pace of shift in the external environment continues to outstrip the pace of innovation inside our organizations. Perhaps this is why Association 2.0 feels like a more accurate descriptor for where we are today.

The good news is that W2.0/E2.0 technologies provide us with some powerful collaborative tools that can accelerate our efforts to become whatever is next.  So whether it’s Association 2.0 or Association 5.0, I agree with Maddie: it’s time to move on.

Entry Filed under: Principled Innovation Blog


4 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Maddie Grant  |  November 5th, 2007 at 10:41 pm

    I’m not the first??? Dang!!!! : )

  • 2. Maddie Grant  |  November 5th, 2007 at 10:45 pm

    Seriously though - if you think about it, the historical development of associations as you describe it is still fundamentally structurally the same. Web 2.0 differs from Web 1.0 in that the focus shifts from the DEVELOPER to the USER in terms of generation of content, and for Associations 2.0 the shift might be similarly away from top tier leadership to integrated, multi-level strategic thinking and stewardship. Right?

  • 3. Gary LaBranche  |  November 6th, 2007 at 12:09 pm

    The Association Forum of Chicagolad was founded in 1916, as the world’s first society of association professionals. There were a few other regional groups founded before ASAE, including the Georgia Society of Association Executives.

  • 4. Peggy Hoffman  |  November 18th, 2007 at 10:46 am

    Have to ditto Maddie’s comment that Assn 1-5 is really shifts in the same structure (perhaps Association 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, …). We’re prepaing a session for Great Ideas on the new chapter model which really needs to throw out the current structure and reshape. I liked Bruce Butterfield’s association pix in his 2000 article in assn mgmt http://www.forbesgroup.com/resources/articles/index.cfm/fuseaction/viewArticle/article_id/5/ where he draws a shift from the hub and spokes to a cluster.

Leave a Comment

Required

Required, hidden

*
To prove that you're not a bot, enter this code
Anti-Spam Image

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed

  • Ben Martin and P.I.

    Association exec Ben Martin, CAE is P.I.’s Architect of Participation. Jeff and Ben help clients harness the power of the Web through the strategic application of social tools.

  • New P.I. workshop

    You may now register for The P.I. Business Model Innovation Workshop, which will take place on September 28-29, 2010, in Arlington, Virginia.


P.I. Blog written by

Jeff De Cagna

Get the P.I. Blog!

Most Recent Posts

Categories

Blogroll

Posts by Month