<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The duty of imagination and innovation governance</title>
	<link>http://www.principledinnovation.com/blog/2006/07/30/the-duty-of-imagination-and-innovation-governance/</link>
	<description>Moving from imagination to impact...</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 06:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Gary Arcus</title>
		<link>http://www.principledinnovation.com/blog/2006/07/30/the-duty-of-imagination-and-innovation-governance/#comment-507</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 02:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.principledinnovation.com/blog/2006/07/30/the-duty-of-imagination-and-innovation-governance/#comment-507</guid>
					<description>An excellent observation by Ms Krongold that oversight is not leadership - this is a strong theme that many Board members adopt.  In my experience these Board members also often combine oversight with protection of the long-held status quo - a real dead-weight on the organisation.  
Is imagination alone sufficient? My concern is that imagination and innovation is often the sugar-coating for pet projects promoted without critical attention.  So, maybe we need &quot;critically considered imagination&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An excellent observation by Ms Krongold that oversight is not leadership - this is a strong theme that many Board members adopt.  In my experience these Board members also often combine oversight with protection of the long-held status quo - a real dead-weight on the organisation.<br />
Is imagination alone sufficient? My concern is that imagination and innovation is often the sugar-coating for pet projects promoted without critical attention.  So, maybe we need &#8220;critically considered imagination&#8221;.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

