<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is this right?</title>
	<link>http://www.principledinnovation.com/blog/2006/05/31/is-this-right/</link>
	<description>Moving from imagination to impact...</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 06:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: David Gammel</title>
		<link>http://www.principledinnovation.com/blog/2006/05/31/is-this-right/#comment-390</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 00:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.principledinnovation.com/blog/2006/05/31/is-this-right/#comment-390</guid>
					<description>I should have guessed it was Alan!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should have guessed it was Alan!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ben Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.principledinnovation.com/blog/2006/05/31/is-this-right/#comment-389</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 22:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.principledinnovation.com/blog/2006/05/31/is-this-right/#comment-389</guid>
					<description>Thanks for posting more. I'm not sure I understand exactly what his critique of professional societies is. However, I agree with his overall premise that isolated feedback is virtually useless, but that feedback in a pattern is useful information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for posting more. I&#8217;m not sure I understand exactly what his critique of professional societies is. However, I agree with his overall premise that isolated feedback is virtually useless, but that feedback in a pattern is useful information.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jeff De Cagna</title>
		<link>http://www.principledinnovation.com/blog/2006/05/31/is-this-right/#comment-388</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 20:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.principledinnovation.com/blog/2006/05/31/is-this-right/#comment-388</guid>
					<description>David and Ben, I have provided additional context, as you've requested.

Ben, I understand how you could construe my post as you did.  I have changed some language (notice the strikethrough) and, hopefully, clarified my meaning in the process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David and Ben, I have provided additional context, as you&#8217;ve requested.</p>
<p>Ben, I understand how you could construe my post as you did.  I have changed some language (notice the strikethrough) and, hopefully, clarified my meaning in the process.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ben Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.principledinnovation.com/blog/2006/05/31/is-this-right/#comment-387</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 20:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.principledinnovation.com/blog/2006/05/31/is-this-right/#comment-387</guid>
					<description>A longer blurb from the consultant, for starters, would provide a better context.  Or perhaps the whole article.

Perhaps inappropriately, I viewed your concern-raising as a leading question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A longer blurb from the consultant, for starters, would provide a better context.  Or perhaps the whole article.</p>
<p>Perhaps inappropriately, I viewed your concern-raising as a leading question.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jeff De Cagna</title>
		<link>http://www.principledinnovation.com/blog/2006/05/31/is-this-right/#comment-385</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 19:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.principledinnovation.com/blog/2006/05/31/is-this-right/#comment-385</guid>
					<description>Ben, thanks for posting.  I just want to be clear that I'm raising concerns rather than making statements.  

What kind of context would be helpful to you in sharing your thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben, thanks for posting.  I just want to be clear that I&#8217;m raising concerns rather than making statements.  </p>
<p>What kind of context would be helpful to you in sharing your thoughts?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ben Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.principledinnovation.com/blog/2006/05/31/is-this-right/#comment-383</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 19:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.principledinnovation.com/blog/2006/05/31/is-this-right/#comment-383</guid>
					<description>If I had a little more context I could provide some commentary. However, I think you're right in saying that most professional societies aren't making much of an impact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I had a little more context I could provide some commentary. However, I think you&#8217;re right in saying that most professional societies aren&#8217;t making much of an impact.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jeff De Cagna</title>
		<link>http://www.principledinnovation.com/blog/2006/05/31/is-this-right/#comment-382</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 17:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.principledinnovation.com/blog/2006/05/31/is-this-right/#comment-382</guid>
					<description>David, you're right, it isn't confidential.  I will post the consultant's name, but before I do, I'd like get some reactions to the words themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, you&#8217;re right, it isn&#8217;t confidential.  I will post the consultant&#8217;s name, but before I do, I&#8217;d like get some reactions to the words themselves.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: David Gammel</title>
		<link>http://www.principledinnovation.com/blog/2006/05/31/is-this-right/#comment-381</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 16:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.principledinnovation.com/blog/2006/05/31/is-this-right/#comment-381</guid>
					<description>So, who was it? If they put it in a newsletter then it probably isn't confidential.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, who was it? If they put it in a newsletter then it probably isn&#8217;t confidential.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

