It’s not 1986…
April 13th, 2006
Does your association still produce print directories? Well, it’s time to stop. Not a year from now, three years from now or five years from now. Stop today. Stop right now.
This is the essential advice of blogger Max Kalehoff. Max, a member of the Marketing Research Association in Glastonbury, Connecticut, makes clear that he regards “the 10-pound, dead-tree format” for directories as toast. He is dumping his $99.95 “monster” directory ($169.95 for non-members) in the recycle bin, not even taking the time to bring it to his new office space. Max suggests that MRA take the savings from not printing the directory to create a better online directory site with improved search capabilities. As he writes, “It’s 2006, not 1986.”
I completely agree with Max. The traditional print directories published by so many associations are simply screaming out to be innovated. Print directories are static and cumbersome, environmentally unconscious, obsolete even before publication, and do little if anything to support the building of stronger relationships between and among members and business partners. So why do we still print them?
Well, there’s the rub. It’s the one point on this subject that Max’s post doesn’t address accurately. For most associations, print directories are significant source of advertising revenue, so the “savings” he describes would more likely be losses of existing revenue streams. This is why we must explore how to innovate the print directory rather than simply sunset it.
One possible solution is to create the directory as a stand-alone application that can be uploaded to a mobile phone or other handheld device, with regular updates and upgrades available for downloading via the Web. The application, its updates and the main online directory Web site can all include Google-style text ads based on keywords that link to very specific and relevant offers to that organization’s members. The value of this kind of directory would increase exponentially over the print version for both members and advertisers.
But this is simply one idea. I’d like to hear others, so please share. And by the way, this post is the first of many in the new “Extreme Makeover: Association Edition” category to which I’ll be posting on this blog. If you have an “extreme makeover” topic you’d like me to tackle, just send me an e-mail!

If you're new here, I hope you will consider subscribing to the P.I. Blog. Just click on this link to add it to your RSS reader. You can also receive e-mail updates by subscribing via the box located on the blog itself. Thanks for visiting!
Entry Filed under: Principled Innovation Blog, Announcements, Social Media, Innovation, Associations, Extreme Makeover
Ben Martin and P.I.
Association exec Ben Martin, CAE is P.I.’s Architect of Participation. Jeff and Ben help clients harness the power of the Web through the strategic application of social tools.

The AST Executive Summary
The executive summary of the groundbreaking Association Social Technologies survey project is now available for download! The full report will be available in October.


















2 Comments Add your own
1. Shawn Lea | April 17th, 2006 at 1:47 pm
We have both - or actually three - a deadtree version, an online Web version and an Acrobat version of our paper directory. Face it, just as there are those who hate paper versions, like Max and myself, just as many in most large associations hate electronic versions too. Perhaps the wiser move would be to ask your members which they personally prefer and at least cut down on the number of printed copies by figuring out who is going to immediately throw it in the trash. It’s not fun, but I believe communications folk at associations are going to have to rely on this belt-and-suspenders approach for electronic and paper communications for a while. Hopefully, ten years now that won’t be the case. But it is now.
2. Nick | April 18th, 2006 at 12:32 pm
I think that in some cases people’s online set-ups for directories are not up to snuff and people have more use for the printed ones. Clearly people should take a look at their online directories and if they are not being used preferentially then some questions should be asked. I would like to see people’s dead tree directories go away, but is it worth making people mad? Most associations have so few tangibles anyhow… Just my thoughts.
Leave a Comment
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed